Case law can be a great tool in resolving coverage and claims disputes. Find a precedent-setting court case to support your position and you’ve probably won the debate. However, not all court decisions are correct. This article illustrates that point when a court, we believe, erroneously considers damage caused by a dropped object to constitute “marring” which is excluded by the policy.
Big ‘I” members must be logged in to view all the content on this page.