The named insureds have separate HO-3 policies on two homes. One is occupied by their daughter as her primary residence, but she is not a named insured. The daughter's residence was burglarized and the daughter made a claim for loss of her personal property. The company denied the claim under her parents' HO- 3 because she is not a resident of their household, even though she is a relative. Is this correct?
Big ‘I” members must be logged in to view all the content on this page.