Is It an Auto or Is It Mobile Equipment?
One of the most debated commercial lines issues is whether or not a vehicle is an “auto” or “mobile equipment.” When you carefully read the policy definitions, it’s amazing how many vehicles fit the definition of “mobile equipment,” even vehicles licensed and used on public highways. In fact, it’s possible that a vehicle could be an “auto” under one set of circumstances and “mobile equipment” under another. In this article, we’ll look at an example of this debate.
One of the most debated commercial lines issues is whether or not a vehicle is an “auto” or “mobile equipment.” When you carefully read the policy definitions, it’s amazing how many vehicles fit the definition of “mobile equipment,” even vehicles licensed and used on public highways. In fact, it’s possible that a vehicle could be an “auto” under one set of circumstances and “mobile equipment” under another. In this article, we’ll look at an example of this debate.
A business might have a CGLbut not aBAPpolicy (fairly common), a BAP but not a CGL policy (less common), or they might have both policies with the same or different carriers. In such cases, it can be critical whether BI or PD is caused by an “auto” or “mobile equipment” (it can be important even if both policies are provided by the same carrier). When you carefully read the policy definitions, it’s amazing how many vehicles fit the definition of “mobile equipment,” even vehicles licensed and used on public highways. In fact, it’s possible that a vehicle could be an “auto” under one set of circumstances and “mobile equipment” under another. For example, here’s an “Ask an Expert” question we recently received: A local used car dealership is loaning motorhomes to various non-profit organizations to use as an office or changing room when the non-profits hold an event that needs an office or changing room. Let’s call it AL’s used cars. AL (and this is true) requires the non-profit organization to furnish him a certificate of CGL liability coverage naming him as an additional insured for use of the motorhome as an office and/or changing room. It is OK with AL if the certificate states that coverage applies only while the motorhome is stationary. AL has furnished us with copies of certificates that others PROBLEM: CG0001 exclusion “g” excludes ownership maintenance, use or entrustment of any “auto.” I don’t think we, or anyone else can issue a certificate of liability insurance on a CGL policy naming AL as an additional insured for AL’s motorhome that the non-profit is using.
Response 1 Response 2
Response 3 If the vehicles are “maintained primarily for purposes other than the transportation of person or cargo,” (e.g., I encountered a similar situation involving using Winnebagos as mobile classrooms) could they be considered mobile equipment? As I understand it, they’re basically mobile offices or changing rooms. This appears to be a CGL exposure. For other examples of BAP vs. CGL controversies, check out these articles: |
Copyright © 2025, Big “I” Virtual University. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner without the prior written permission from Big “I” Virtual University. For further information, contact nancy.germond@iiaba.net.