Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
OTHER PAGE

Conditions

Within the wording of the commercial property policy’s replacement cost provision there is a 180 day “limitation.” How does this supposed limitation actually apply and to whom does it apply? For whatever reason, some insurance carriers routinely use this supposed limitation incorrectly.
The concept of actual cash value (ACV) is far more complicated than “replacement cost minus physical depreciation.” In fact, the meaning of replacement cost differs based on the state. To further complicate the “problem” with defining ACV is whether or not labor is depreciable. Again, the answer differs based on the state in which the property is located.
The Agreed Value Option (AVO) is an alternative to coinsurance in the ISO Building and Personal Property Coverage Form (CP 00 10). Agreed Value can be used with buildings or personal property, on either an actual cash value (ACV) or replacement cost (RC) basis. However, many agents are not aware of how this option must be used very carefully.
As of this writing 38 states and countless cities and counties have enacted some form of stay-at-home order amid the pandemic panic arising from COVID-19. If the operation is not considered an “essential” business, its doors are shut - for now. How long such orders will or even can stay in place is anyone’s guess.
An agent asks: We have a few clients with multiple retail locations throughout various states with various policies. If they have locations which receive damages from riots on multiples nights, how many claims would this be considered and therefore how many deductibles? Our VU volunteer faculty provides the answers.
A concept as common as the application of a “property deductible” is rarely taught or even considered, it is simply “understood.” The problem is we tend towards the belief that everyone “understands” the application of a property deductible the same way. They don’t.
Carriers seem to believe that a property loss must be discovered within 180 days of the event causing the damage for the policy to respond on a replacement cost basis; even some agents believe this. Well, it just isn’t true. Find out why.
Work patterns since COVID-19 sent millions of workers home had a big impact on the commercial real estate market. And although JP Morgan predicts commercial real estate will come “bouncing back” in 2022, it’s a great time to remind your clients of the need to understand their commercial property policies’ vacancy clauses.
The concept of actual cash value (ACV) is far more complicated than “replacement cost minus physical depreciation.” In fact, the meaning of replacement cost differs based on the state. To further complicate the “problem” with defining ACV is whether or not labor is depreciable. Again, the answer differs based on the state in which the property is located.
Your insured buys a building for $250,000. The ACV of the building is closer to $750,000, but the insured only wants to insure the amount of his financial investment. Since coverage is usually based on ACV or replacement cost, underinsurance could result in a huge coinsurance penalty. What can you do?
You'd think after 100+ years of application that coinsurance questions would rarely arise. However, few commercial property provisions are debated more often than coinsurance. In this article, we'll take a look at several coinsurance issues – a couple of them basic, but fundamentally important, and another one a little more complicated – and we'll also link to another article that you can use to explain coinsurance to your clients.
The building is currently insured for replacement cost. The insurer did a new valuation and said the policy limit is 70% of the RC value, which would result in a coinsurance penalty for a partial loss. Is the insured who probably won't rebuild with a total loss better off, if the company will allow it, remaining at RC with a coinsurance penalty or going to ACV because a partial loss would still be replacement less the coinsurance penalty?
Under the valuation condition in a property policy, you can choose to settle a claim using ACV instead of RC (even if you have RC on the declarations page). In such a case, if there is a coinsurance penalty, is it based on ACV or RC? In this article, which builds on a prior article, we'll examine this issue.
One of the most difficult insurance concepts to explain to insureds is coinsurance. To assist you, there are several VU articles listed below that should be helpful. In addition, John Wheeler, CPCU, an agent in Lake City, Florida has come up with a graphical Excel spreadsheet that visually displays how the coinsurance penalty works. John has allowed us to share this very cool tool with IIABA member agencies.
One of the toughest tasks facing insurance agents involves how to go about explaining coinsurance...why it exists, what's its purpose, and how it works. Below is an explanation that you might find of value in discussing the purpose of coinsurance with your clients, along with a deposition excerpt from an agent who couldn't explain it.
Your insured is a contractor. He wants to repair insured damage to his own building to ensure that the job is done right. Or, let's say he negligently causes damage to a customer's property that is covered by his CGL policy and wants to make repairs himself. Is the insurer obligated to pay an amount that includes profit and overhead for the work done by its insured?
As we all know, insurance seminars and articles can be a little on the 'dry' side. So, every now and then, when you select an article from the Research Library, you may get the unexpected. We want the Virtual University to be more than some stale, stoic repository of insurance technica...hey, let's have a little fun! Now, on with the topic at hand...
The carrier has denied payment for covered damage to our insured tentant's improvements and betterments based on a clause in the lease that states that all additions, alterations, etc. become the property of the landlord and, consequently, the insured has no insurable interest in that property. The adjuster who wrote the letter advised me that she is instructed to issue these letters and the directive to do so comes from people much higher than her or her manager. Huh?
Question: I have always understood Agreed Value to do away with the coinsurance clause. I have also understood it to stand alone, meaning no ACV or RC noted on the Dec. page for the particular item showing agreed value. Am I correct or mistaken? If I am correct in both instances, is it correct for the company to show either ACV or RC as well as coinsurance on the Dec. page?
This is Part 1 of 2 from my Agent & Broker magazine column that generated the most 'fan mail' of any columns I've written over the years. If you use 'toy' valuation systems like room counts or square footage in determining building values (in either commercial or personal lines), you need to read this two-part article!
This is Part 2 of 2 from my Agent & Broker magazine column that generated the most 'fan mail' of any columns I've written over the years. If you use 'toy' valuation systems like room counts or square footage in determining building values (in either commercial or personal lines), you need to read this two-part article!
image 
 
​127 South Peyton Street
Alexandria VA 22314
​phone: 800.221.7917
fax: 703.683.7556
email: info@iiaba.net

Follow Us!


​Empowering Trusted Choice®
Independent Insurance Agents.