Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
S1-Post-Only

Should an Agency Purchase E&O Coverage from One of Its Carriers?

Author: VU Faculty 

Proper placement of the agency's errors & omissions (E&O) coverage is of utmost importance. Protection provided by an E&O policy can be the difference between the agency's continued success and financial ruin.

Errors and omissions (E&O) coverage is of utmost importance

Agencies have many options available for the placement of their E&O coverage. For some agencies, one of the options is purchasing E&O coverage directly from one of their appointed carriers. In fact, these carriers constantly solicit their appointed agents, enticing them with exclusive perks for placing their E&O coverage such as points towards carrier incentive plans, reductions in deductibles for E&O claims and applying the E&O premiums towards overall production.

On the surface, this seems like a good deal, especially since the agency already has a relationship with the appointed carrier. The agency trusts them to protect its customers, they are highly rated and they a have a great reputation for paying claims. But serving the agency's clients and defending the agency from E&O claims are two separate and distinct relationships. The line between what is best for the agency and best for the customer becomes blurred; the two aren't always compatible. Further, what is best for the carrier and best for the agency may not be the same either. It's seldom spoken of when this happens, but it's always lurking in the background, and it's called “conflict of interest."

Before placing E&O coverage with any carrier the agency is appointed to represent, there are several factors that agent principals must consider.

Agent vs. Direct

Big “I" considers promoting the value insurance agents bring to their customers as part of its mission. Independent agents know the value they add to customers, so why would the agency not want the benefit of a trained professional liability agent working on its behalf?

Professional liability can be tricky, and just because an agent knows the coverage needs of their customers doesn't necessarily translate into knowing the nuances of agents' E&O coverage. Big “I" state association personnel whose only focus is professional liability work closely with the agency to service its E&O needs. Yes, even the best agency benefits from the professional service and knowledge offered by a dedicated E&O professional.

Damaging Carrier Relationships

The intrinsic value of agencies is their book of business and carrier appointments. A disagreement about the handling of an E&O claim has the potential to severely strain that relationship and may hamper any long-term representation. If the agency is embroiled in an E&O claim involving the same carrier, maybe even forcing the carrier to fight for and against its agent, these discussions and outcomes can harm relationships.

Sharing Application Data

E&O applications necessarily contain large amounts of sensitive and proprietary information necessary for underwriting. This data includes premiums by line of business, revenue, staff count, appointed carriers and descriptions of office procedures. In addition to knowing all the carriers with which the agency holds appointments, the E&O carrier will also know the amount of business with each carrier.

Will the E&O department keep this information confidential; or is it shared with other departments? The hope is that the information is kept confidential, but there may be no guarantees. It is easy to imagine the carrier's field underwriter hounding the agency for more business because of this inside information.

Increasing Carrier Claims Against Agents

Carriers analyze E&O claims data regularly to reveal claims trends. One very clear trend that began nearly two decades ago is the steady increase in carriers suing agents for mistakes that result in damages to the carrier. Defending an agent against itself creates a clear conflict of interest for the carrier.

Conflict of Interest

Once the carrier decides the agent has created an E&O incident, all the years of a pleasant and profitable business relationship nay be quickly forgotten. The carrier only has one purpose in mind – forcing the agent to pay the claim. So, if the E&O is with that same carrier, there is an immediate conflict of interest because the E&O contract places on the carrier the sole duty of defending the agency. But if the carrier is also trying to lay blame on the agency; how can it, in good faith, also defend the agency? It's rather mind-bending to think about, but what kind of defense can the agency expect when the carrier is defending the agency against itself?

Protecting the Agency's E&O Claims History

Many potential E&O incidents involve “he said, she said" narratives of the relevant incidents. What happens when a customer written by the same carrier is the subject of a potential E&O incident? Even if the agency didn't make a mistake, the customer may misrepresent the facts in an attempt to secure payment from the E&O policy. The E&O carrier must make the decision to defend the agent or pay the retail customer's underlying claim to appease them. Maybe the carrier just decides to pay the loss as an E&O claim under the agency's account because it is less expensive than defending it. There are two problems to this approach for the agency: 1) the agency's E&O policy has a deductible, and 2) the E&O carrier can use the claim to justify future rate increases or simply cancel the policy.

Also, the loss will show up on the agency's loss history and will likely have a negative impact on the agency's ability to shop future E&O coverage.

Consider all Your Options

Agencies have a choice to make regarding the placement of their E&O coverage. This article lays out just a few factors that must be considered when making this very important decision. Although placing the coverage with a carrier the agency represents may seem safe and convenient, the ultimate risk may be too high.

Agents are better served placing their E&O coverage with long-term, stable programs focused strictly on agents' E&O coverage. Not only are these programs more focused, but they also aren't full of the inherent conflicts of interest common when placing coverage with an appointed carrier.

For more information on the Big I's E&O program, click this link or contact your state's Big I Association.

​Published: January 26, 2024

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Copyright © 2024, Big “I" Virtual University. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner without the prior written permission from Big “I" Virtual University. For further information, contact jamie.behymer@iiaba.net.​

image 
 
​127 South Peyton Street
Alexandria VA 22314
​phone: 800.221.7917
fax: 703.683.7556
email: info@iiaba.net

Follow Us!


​Empowering Trusted Choice®
Independent Insurance Agents.